Thursday, June 30, 2016

Summer Camp Playwriting - Day 3

(also published on the Writers Theatre of NJ blog)

Picking up where we left off in Tuesday's class, I shared with the students the advice from Twitter about crafting scenes. In addition to what was mentioned in yesterday’s post, I also included these ideas from Ramon Esquivel (@Bub1974)
  • Good Q. 1st draft, I write scene until it naturally ends/shifts. Later, I CUT to shape story tone + pacing.
  • 1st drafts are about finding character for me. I let 1d scenes run/meander as long as needed. Find voices!

The suggestions received on Twitter immediately sparked ideas within the class and they quickly made some edits to the scenes already written. I coupled this with a quick discussion of The Hero’s Journey framework to show how smaller scenes, and their individual tasks/conflicts, can fit into the larger arc of the play. This really sparked the playwrights’ imaginations, particularly when seeing the journey as a 3D spiral rather than the 2D drawing I had done on the board. We had already discussed how the Emergency can launch a character into the world of the play whether or not she wants to go. Thinking of this as the point when the character’s world changes was especially useful; understanding that the typical “conclusion” was actually the start of the hero’s return home after completing, and being changed by, the journey set them off scribbling and typing new ideas.
Our version of Joseph Campbell's The Hero's Journey
The class also liked the idea of introducing additional characters into the play as “mentors and demons,” who either help or hurt the heroine in her journey. One student suggested the term “demon” be changed to “dementor,” which I thought was a great idea. (You’ll see that term on the chart above.) I also added the phrase “line of change” to emphasize the points at which the main character experiences change in the journey paradigm.

We explored conflict through a letter writing exercise in which the main character writes to a potential mentor for help on the journey. That letter was shared with another playwright who wrote a response letter as if they were the person to whom the page was addressed. The respondent did not know anything about the character other than that person’s name; they also had to refuse to help. The first playwright wrote another letter in response and this time the respondent could either agree or again refuse. This activity takes a lot of time, but can be helpful not only in demonstrating conflict, but for beginning to develop the additional character(s) who may be found along the hero’s journey.

The students made great strides in their writing today, but still need some more time to write tomorrow. A couple have suggested that they may be done, but I anticipate that there will be more of the story to tell. I’m considering bringing in a few of our summer interns to read the plays so the playwrights get a chance to hear the words outside of their own heads. This is much earlier than I would typically do something like this, but I think they are ready. Can’t wait!

No comments:

Post a Comment